> Syntactically I would prefer something that aligns the loop variables with
> the containers
Yes, this looks nice.
Btw, a similar syntax exists in Julia, but what it does is completely different
- it is syntactic sugar for nested for-loops.
> Indeed that's a much better syntax, I have absolutely no idea how to
> introduce it though.
For me, a step forward to a better syntax would be just introducing in instead
of , between elements and containers:
forEach [x, y, z] in [a, b, c]:
Also, changing square brackets to parentheses looks more intuitive to me, as I
expect zip to yield tuples:
forEach (x, y, z) in (a, b, c):
