@Araq Maybe you don't need flexibility but please imagine using a it-template inside of an it-template (e.g. an apply inside of an apply). Just like @olwi said, => is better and I think it should be brought to standard Nim.
People only mention two reasons to use it-templates, correct me if I'm wrong: * "shorter code" \--- ok, but also less flexible (apply-in-apply) and less readable (a matter of taste, I admit) * "closures are inefficient" \--- why not making them efficient somehow? Like inlining, let's say? @doofenstein But it's optional (just like in, let's say, Scala). Why? Because of the higher-order-functions composition, which would make it (pun intended) ambiguous.
