While working on PR [https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/4683](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/4683), I found some different naming schemes in I/O while working with buffers. For example:
* `readBuffer/writeBuffer` in system.nim, asyncfile.nim (from PR) * `recv/send` in net.nim * `recvInto/send` in asyncdispatch.nim, asyncnet.nim (from PR, see [https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/4683#issuecomment-244782731](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/4683#issuecomment-244782731)) * `readData/writeData` in streams.nim Are you OK with that? Maybe we can reach consensus with these names before 1.0 is out? I think that it's better to have one scheme for them, for example: `readBuffer/writeBuffer` and `recvBuffer/sendBuffer`. What do you think about it?
