> IMO include is good enough.
No it's not. I've expanded on why include is not good enough, see my updated post here [https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/4296#26730](https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/4296#26730)
- `import foo {.private.}` to allows access to private fields (... timothee
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to allows access to private... cumulonimbus
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to allows access to pri... timothee
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to allows access to... treeform
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to allows acces... cumulonimbus
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to allows ... timothee
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to all... cblake
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... boia01
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... dom96
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... timothee
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... Trustable
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... kobi
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... LeuGim
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... zahary
- Re: `import foo {.private.}` to... timothee
