> Checking that the Nimble license metadata matches the license claims in the > code.
Very true. > I think most people will disagree with me on where this line should be drawn.. Very true :o) > .., but it needs to be drawn somewhere... Yes, individually by every user of a library. If I don't like the license, I don't use the thing. > Politely nagging module authors to encourage using the same legal terms as > Nim itself: the good 'ol MIT license, or equivalent. Don't nag, give people reasons: why pick MIT over Apache 2? MIT doesn't have patent protection and patent trolls are a real-world problem.
