I've never been a fan of these language comparisons, regardless of how they turn out. They always pick some factors that the author considers big selling points, but may be either irrelevant, important, or actual negatives from the reader's perspective. And this particular comparison is 90% bikeshedding, so it doesn't tell me anything I'm actually interested in.
Actually comparing languages is something that I don't think is really possible in a way that is informative. Programming languages and their runtimes are not suitable for a feature-by-feature comparison; most of their features are too interdependent to be looked at in isolation.
