Update: This weekend I decided to try Haxe once again. I successfully installed the Lime library, and built a simple example (via compilation Haxe -> C++). Results:
1) It works. Although the compilation time is VERY, VERY, VERY, ..., VERY LONG in comparison to both Nim and Go. I can only hope, that it take so long only for the first time. 2) A simple app, doing nothing else besides showing a window with some image, weights over 10MB. Ridiculous, in comparison to both Go (1-2MB) and Nim (100k). I'm not sure, whether it uses static, or dynamic linking, though. > [https://nim-lang.org/docs/tables.html](https://nim-lang.org/docs/tables.html) > eh? It's a module, not a built-in datatype. In both Python, and Go, I don't have to import anything, when I want use dictionaries/maps. A really minor flaw, IMO. > you could take a look at other bindings (...) After a (really) quick look: it seems to have a more consistent API. Thanks. (Why the heck two diffferent bindings??? ;-))
