For me, high quality lib is: * works as stated * does the job * issues are addressed promptly
What I don't care about in this lib: * how code is formatted * is code documented * does it have tests How do I find is it good library? * I try it * I find references from other users **References from other users are most valuable to me.** People who use libs should be the judges. When you put numbers to quality attributes people will compare them. In this case **quality** is measure of how lib **conforms to some standard**. It is not **quality** in sense how well it **solves problem**. To me it implies that you know what library does, what business problem it solves and how well it works. Suggestion: * don't use numbers * don't use word _quality_ , be precise with meaning * add fields _popularity, recommended_
