Interesting! If I understand you correctly, I should make a SplineType type
with a handler field to hold the eval proc. And then newHermiteSpline() would
return a SplineType with handler set to the Hermite's eval proc. Have I
understood you correctly then?
> How would you go about accessing the other variables of the Node in your
> case? When you call the backward proc you would have to do something like
> this right?:
node.backward(node.gate, node.payload)
Run
Could that be shortened down to something that resembles node.backward()? A
template could work I'd guess, something along the lines of:
template eval*[T](spline: SplineType[T], x: float): untyped =
spline.handler(spline.X, spline.coeffs, x)
template eval*[T](spline: SplineType[T], x: openArray[float]): untyped =
spline.handler_seq(spline.X, spline.coeffs, x)
Run
Could this work or did you have anything different in mind? :-)
