Hi !
Because you mentioned that. Is there actually a point in using nistnet? It
seems as if netem is much simpler to install than nistnet. Are there some
features in nistnet that netem doesn't offer?
Best regards
Marc Rochel
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von David Boreham
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Januar 2006 17:08
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [nistnet] Delay and bandwidth
David Morris wrote:
>My guess is that use of delay and bandwidth together are a conflict.
>Fundamentally, delay of packets is how bandwidth is going to be limited.
>At best NistNet is likely to add the two delays computed for a packet
>resulting in a larger net delay.
>
>
I dunno about nistnet, but we've successfully used netem and htb here to
simulate both throughput and latency limits at the same time.
_______________________________________________
nistnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nistnet
_______________________________________________
nistnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nistnet
