Hi Peter, Peter Simons <[email protected]> writes:
> >> Does anyone have a suggestion how to remedy that problem? > > > > Perhaps you could make the patch conditional on whether ‘stdenv’ > > contains a ‘glibc’ attribute? > > That won't help, unfortunately, because the glibc 2.5 systems have a > stdenv.glibc attribute, too. It's just that it's version 2.5. Oh, right, I thought you were using ‘stdenvNative’. > Of course, it's possible to use some other suitable mechanism to > determine whether that bogus scandir patch can be applied or not, but I > guess my favorite solution would be for someone to fix that patch so > that it just doesn't break checkinstall. Then we can apply it > unconditionally. An obvious candidate for that job might be the person > who committed that patch in the first place, maybe? *cough* *cough*. :-) Ludo’. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
