"Yury G. Kudryashov" <[email protected]> writes: > Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> "Yury G. Kudryashov" <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>> Yury G Kudryashov <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> GnuPG tests fail without running gpg-agent >>>> >>>> Then it looks like a regression compared to 2.0.12. For GNU programs >>>> “make check” alone should do the right thing, including starting >>>> auxiliary programs if needed. Could you report it upstream? >>> Already written to gnupg-devel mailing list. >> >> Cool, thanks. In that case, for packages I (co-)maintain at least, I >> prefer if there’s a link to the discussion so we don’t lose track of >> what’s going on. > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2010-April/025576.html
Sorry, I meant a link visible in default.nix close to the workaround. Ludo’. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
