Vladimír Čunát <vcu...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi. > > On 24 July 2011 18:11, Sander van der Burg - EWI > <s.vanderb...@tudelft.nl> wrote: >> Convenience, hmm... Personally, I find it confusing if the name of this >> emulator would be: visual_boy_advance or something like that, while the >> package on the internet is named: VisualBoyAdvance . Similarly, a lot of >> Java packages use naming conventions like this. > > I agree on this point - I respect the convention but I find it > unnecessary. I think most distributions tend to stick to upstream > naming conventions. There might be some minor portability problems > with CamelCase filenames (I'm not sure), as some OSs are case > insensitive. But on the whole I certainly wouldn't mind to drop this > restriction, or are there any other reasons for it? > > Vlada
Most distributions follow 'lower case separeted by dashes' convention. Such names are easier to type and you dont have to remember to always use 'grep -i' for ex. -- Alexander Tsamutali _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@cs.uu.nl https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
