<16b0358b83ffeaf7d2876f231de4e64d.squir...@webmail.shealevy.com> <e1qtbry-0003pi-00.7c6f434c-mail...@smtp8.mail.ru>) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>> >> I guess default uname should say version of kernel from kernelheaders >> >> used for glibc, and kernelPackages one should say the kernel version >> >> of the passed kernel? >> >I'd like a list of the problems this would solve. >> General idea is to forcibly remove one more impurity. >> FF6.0 release manages to trigger it. >Is this impurity affecting the behaviour of FF6.0? If it is, I think they are >doing something wrong. If they care about the API, they should check the kernel >headers version.h, and not uname. They do something wrong, they admit it, but this "wrong" is in their "6.0" release tarball. They have a fix, maybe it will be in 6.0.1 - I have no idea. But Nix has a few tricks to stop builders from doing obviously wrong things. >Or is it simply storing what kernel was it running at build time, and you care >on getting always the same 'hash' on the result directory? Not really. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@cs.uu.nl https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev