Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/08/2011 01:33 AM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>
>>> On 09/08/2011 12:52 AM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>>>
>>>> + svn = subversionClient.override { perlBindings = true; };
>>>
>>> Why do we need to use a separate build of Subversion here?
>>>
>>> Doesn't this just cause all KDE users to have two (or more) copies of
>>> Subversion in their closures?
>>
>> Why a KDE user would need the server part of subversion in the closure?
>
> The "subversion" attribute in Nixpkgs is part of the NixOS base system
> (and does *not* include the Apache module, btw).
It seems that I made a mistake... Could you please explain the difference
between subversion and subversionClient in more details? Do we need
"subversion" (not svnClient) in the base system?
--
Yury G. Kudryashov,
mailto: ur...@mccme.ru
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@cs.uu.nl
https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
