Isolating aspects of the original mail: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:36:20 +0200, Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net> wrote: > If ./bin/python is a symlink, we have currently a problem and PYTHONHOME > would be a solution, if python is a real file, we do not have a problem. > > So instead of symlinking the python executable, nix-env should be instructed > to hard-link it - is this possible?
Why is nix using symlinks to link files in the nix store? Would switching to hardlinks break something? - symlinks in case of whole directories - hardlinks for individual files -- Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net> GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083 Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
pgpWI8UPz99Lr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
