On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Rickard Nilsson wrote: > Hi, > > In my experimentations with shared Nix stores and/or db, I needed a > working NFSv4 client, which NixOS doesn't have. So I fixed that. I > have attached two rather large patches, one for nixos and one for > nixpkgs. What I have done is, basically, that I have replaced > "portmap" with "rpcbind", added "libnfsidmap", updated various > libraries and utilities, and adjusted the NFS upstart jobs to start > rpcbind and rpc.idmapd.
Shouldn't we keep portmap? Maybe we can have an option choosing what rpc mechanism nixos should use. But I prefer keeping portmap. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
