On 03/27/2012 04:45 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:51:45AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote: >> On 03/27/2012 02:05 AM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: >> because not all impurities are evil (the dependency on /bin/sh is hardly >> problematic), but that's what I mean by the term. > Doesn't ubuntu have 'ash' there? :)
Depending on /bin/bash, or using bash-specific functionality in a script that uses /bin/sh would be a problem, but from my understanding ash is sh-compatible. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
