Hi, On 25/01/13 09:32, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
>> I see nix is getting quite popular :-) >> The maintainer is of course welcome to maintain also the nix expression >> *within* nixpkgs, who else is a better candidate... > > Yes, absolutely, and that is completely OK. But you might want to keep > an in-development default.nix in the upstream repo, too. It's actually > very nice to use Nix during development, for handling dependencies, > installing throw-away stuff in your profile, etc. Yes, I totally agree. I have exactly that problem with packages like Hydra and Charon, which have Nix expressions in their own trees to build them - which then needs to be duplicated in Nixpkgs to make them available there :-( -- Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
