Cool, thanks! It opens the way for many good thinks, like ctags generator, safe automatic package updaters, and so on!
Sergey 2013/3/23 Vladimír Čunát <vcu...@gmail.com>: > On 03/23/2013 12:05 PM, Marc Weber wrote: >> >> I thought about writing a Haskell interpreter for nix, too. >> Haskell is very close to nix (being lazy) that comparing performance >> would be interesting. >> >> So what is your goal? > > > If we want some more advanced features for nix (like strong typing), then > converting to EDSL in Haskell is IMHO one of the best ways to do it. (The > store-handling would probably remain in C(++) to keep dependencies low.) > > Vlada > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
