On 01/28/2014 04:36 PM, Shea Levy wrote: > Thoughts? If we did decide this was a good idea, we should set aside > some time period by which people should unmaintain packages they don't > want this responsibility for and adopt packages they do.
I like your ideas and think that they will help to create a more reliable list of packages. I for one stumbled upon some broken but maintained packages when trying to install them (often without time to fix them or motivation to create an issue). I find this somehow more frustrating as if the package is not there at all or marked as broken. Pascal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev