Vladimír Čunát <vcu...@gmail.com> writes: > On 04/07/2014 11:36 AM, Kirill Elagin wrote: >> So, the question is: what is the purpose of having >> services.dbus.packages if those configs are considered anyway due to >> packages being in systemPackages? > > AFAIK there are cases where packages are not put into systemPackages, > only to services.dbus.packages. (But that can't prevent the users or > other options from independently adding the very same package to > systemPackages.)
I use that as much as possible. There's really no need for a lot of packages to be in systemPackages or in some user profile if they only provide a service and don't have lots of often-used CLI tools. Same goes for udevPackages. However, wouldn't it be possible to uniq/nub these lists on evaluation? It's perfectly functional/declarative, but I don't know if derivations are comparable (for equality). > > > Vlada > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
