On 22/08/2014 17:47, Nicolas Pierron wrote: > Not parsing, just providing a different way to handle the submodule > options. Translating, whatever. The same job that is done from upstart to systemd. Except that upstart->systemd is easier than systemd->actual implementation I believe. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in ini... Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in... Eelco Dolstra
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in... Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in ini... Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in... Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Nicolas Pierron
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Nicolas Pierron
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Nicolas Pierron
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in ini... Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Alexander Kjeldaas
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in ini... Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in ini... Nicolas Pierron
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd LluĂs Batlle i Rossell
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Luca Bruno
- Re: [Nix-dev] systemd in initrd Luca Bruno