Hi, cabal2nix will pick it up automatically, but you have to run cabal update first.
Am 07.11.2014 21:22 schrieb "Carlo Nucera" <medit...@gmail.com>: > > Ok, the author was very kind and fast and released on hackage the new version without that bound. > Now, how can I clear the cache of cabal2nix? When I try cabal://roman-numerals it still get the precedent version (I'm guessing it' cached because I don't see the usual downloading trace) > > 2014-11-07 19:51 GMT+01:00 Peter Simons <sim...@cryp.to>: >> >> Hi Carlo, >> >> > Configuring roman-numerals-0.5.1.4... >> > Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: >> > text >=0.11 && <1.2 >> >> it would be great if you could contact the authors of that package to >> inform them about this issue so that they can release an update. >> >> Meanwhile, you can probably work around the build failure by adding the >> flag "--jailbreak" to the cabal2nix command line when generating the >> expression. This will make the build ignore the upper boundary. >> >> >> > Should I package also a version of text pre 1.2.0.0? What are naming >> > conventions in this case? >> >> We have versions 0.11.0.5, 0.11.0.6, 0.11.1.5, 0.11.2.0, 0.11.2.3, >> 0.11.3.1, and 1.1.1.3 packaged in Nix already. Generally speaking, >> though, you should almost always avoid using an older version. It's much >> better for everyone to make the package build with the most recent >> version (which is oftentimes just a matter of ignoring the restrictions >> from the Cabal file). >> >> Best regards, >> Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev