> Maybe you need to script it properly? Maybe StumpWM is less rigid from > the beginning, though (I use it and extended it for my needs, so I can > probably answer your questions if you wonder about it; it is in Common > Lisp, by default all the splits are manual, and there are many hooks > to perform actiosn on events like window addition)
Thanks! However, I'd better not switch to a WM that I wouldn't enjoy
configuring. Also I think that I've bent xmonad pretty much to its
limits and hit the abstraction wall. Nowadays my configuration is a
whole cabalised package that I install via Nix. If you're interested,
it's online [1].
The abstraction wall I hit is StackSet. It is highly sequential
(workspaces are lists of windows, there is a mapping from screens to
workspaces, etc.) and offers absolutely no choice to organise windows
differently. What I mean by "too rigid" is having
f :: Blah X -> M ()
instead of
f :: (SomeAppropriateClass f) => f X -> M ()
thereby enforcing `Blah` instead of an `f` of my choice.
[1]: http://hub.darcs.net/ertes-m/config/browse/myxmonad
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
