Hi, I’m making good progress with this new approach in packaging sensu (the new process is quite a blast actually).
Shall I update the documentation to reflect this or are those actually separate approaches? (Library packaging versus Application packaging) > On 30 Mar 2015, at 09:02, Christian Theune <c...@flyingcircus.io> wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks, Domen! That solution looks nice for packaging ruby apps. :) > > I think that warrants an update to > https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#ssec-language-ruby > <https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#ssec-language-ruby>, right? > > I think I can do that, when I have time again to try again with my current > experiment. > > Christian > > — > Christian Theune · c...@flyingcircus.io <mailto:c...@flyingcircus.io> · +49 > 345 219401 0 > Flying Circus Internet Operations GmbH · http://flyingcircus.io > <http://flyingcircus.io/> > Forsterstraße 29 · 06112 Halle (Saale) · Deutschland > HR Stendal HRB 21169 · Geschäftsführer: Christian. Theune, Christian. > Zagrodnick > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev — Christian Theune · c...@flyingcircus.io · +49 345 219401 0 Flying Circus Internet Operations GmbH · http://flyingcircus.io Forsterstraße 29 · 06112 Halle (Saale) · Deutschland HR Stendal HRB 21169 · Geschäftsführer: Christian. Theune, Christian. Zagrodnick
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
