I'm tentatively in favor of making the switch too. I'm going to test my environment against pure-darwin this weekend.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015, at 08:03, Anthony Cowley wrote: > > > > On Oct 2, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Daniel Peebles <pumpkin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If nobody objects, I think we should just switch over. The only people > > interested in maintaining the darwin ecosystem on Nix don't really want to > > have to maintain two parallel stdenvs, and unless someone stands up to > > fight for the old impure stdenv, I think everyone will be long-term better > > off with the pure one. Yes, there will be some short- and medium-term pain > > during the switch, but there already is with the El Capitan upgrade. > > I vote to go ahead with this, too. Getting just a little help from hydra > in terms of binaries will make it a lot easier to contribute to > pure-Darwin. > > Anthony > > > > > > >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Michael Sperber <sper...@deinprogramm.de> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Daniel Peebles <pumpkin...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > Probably obvious, but I'm in favor of switching/merging :) > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Mike > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nix-dev mailing list > >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nix-dev mailing list > > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
