> I think there are few enough people who contribute to the nix repo as it is > now.
That is actually an argument in favor of a rewrite, C++ is not very popular in the Linux community. Contributing to Nix will become a lot more attractive when it's written in a language that people actually enjoy using. At least that's how I personally feel about it, I'm just not interested in doing any C++ anymore. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016, at 09:26 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > On 01/06/2016 06:36 PM, stewart mackenzie wrote: > > Shall we start defining the nix language? > > None of the perl stuff deals directly with the nix language, so that > seems rather a much independent issue. Personally, I think there are few > enough people who contribute to the nix repo as it is now. Do you think > starting another implementation would help the quality or something > else? Even in a horizon of up to several years? > > --Vladimir > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > Email had 1 attachment: > + smime.p7s > 5k (application/pkcs7-signature) _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
