Bottom line is that texlive updates its packages frequently and our md5 are always out of sync. We mirror some packages but not the whole scheme-full.
AFAIK, you can either use scheme basic, or go trough the update procedure described in texlive-new/default.nix to get a (temporarily) up-to-date list of hashes and build against that. Regards, -- Layus. Le 6 juin 2016 22:33:35 UTC+02:00, Taeer Bar-Yam <tb...@cornell.edu> a écrit : >actually it appears that only scheme-basic is working. scheme-full is >giving me an error about md5 hash mismatches: >( output path ‘/nix/store/ayq32cfk92kiysywxnb35xfhsm4j3wbq-2up.tar.xz’ >has md5 hash ‘7bb1a159a6e50d7cb807c58f471e360e’ when >‘6160fbc7ab71be778081500b908d2648’ was expected ) >does anyone know what the problem is and how to fix it? >> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Taeer Bar-Yam <tb...@cornell.edu> wrote: >> >> I had a similar problem and started using texlive.combine.scheme-full >or texlive.combine.scheme-basic. Maybe try that, see if it works for >what you need? >>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Jeffrey David Johnson <jef...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>> >>> I was using texLiveFull until recently, but now it's marked broken >and a comment points users to the texlive.combine method. I tried >checking out an older version of pkgs/tools/typesetting/tex but the >dependencies don't line up with the rest of nixpkgs anymore. Probably I >just want the full set of texlive-new packages, even if they're big, >becuase I don't know what I'm doing enough to pick and choose. So I >tried this monster (all collections + inputenc packages): >>> >>> myTexlive = with pkgs; texlive.combine { >>> inherit (texlive) >>> collection-basic >>> collection-bibtexextra >>> collection-binextra >>> collection-context >>> collection-fontsextra >>> collection-fontsrecommended >>> collection-fontutils >>> collection-formatsextra >>> collection-games >>> collection-genericextra >>> collection-genericrecommended >>> collection-htmlxml >>> collection-humanities >>> collection-langafrican >>> collection-langarabic >>> collection-langchinese >>> collection-langcjk >>> collection-langcyrillic >>> collection-langczechslovak >>> collection-langenglish >>> collection-langeuropean >>> collection-langfrench >>> collection-langgerman >>> collection-langgreek >>> collection-langindic >>> collection-langitalian >>> collection-langjapanese >>> collection-langkorean >>> collection-langother >>> collection-langpolish >>> collection-langportuguese >>> collection-langspanish >>> collection-latex >>> collection-latexextra >>> collection-latexrecommended >>> collection-luatex >>> collection-mathextra >>> collection-metapost >>> collection-music >>> collection-omega >>> collection-pictures >>> collection-plainextra >>> collection-pstricks >>> collection-publishers >>> collection-science >>> collection-texworks >>> collection-wintools >>> collection-xetex >>> greek-inputenc; >>> }; >>> >>> Still the same error though. Maybe it's a pandoc issue after all. >>> Jeff >>> >>> On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 02:45:18 -0700 >>> Linus Arver <linusar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 04:56:12PM -0700, Jeffrey David Johnson >wrote: >>>>> I get the following error when exporting some markdown to PDF with >pandoc: >>>>> >>>>> An error occured: PDF creation failed: >>>>> ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8: not set up for use >with LaTeX. >>>>> >>>>> See the inputenc package documentation for explanation. >>>>> Type H <return> for immediate help. >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> l.150 Evolutionary Analysis} >>>>> >>>>> Try running pandoc with --latex-engine=xelatex. >>>>> >>>>> I could hunt this one character down, but is there a package I >could add to my texlive environment that might help handle this type of >problem in general? >>>> >>>> I used to use the texliveFull package, which included xelatex. >>>> >>>> FWIW, I no longer use texliveFull; instead I use a Docker container >for >>>> all TeX-related things as it is much simpler to use along with >>>> negligible maintenence costs, if at all. >>>> >>>>> So far I just use the standard one: >>>>> >>>>> myTexLive = texlive.combine { >>>>> inherit (texlive) scheme-small; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> Don't see any mention of xelatex in nixpkgs. >>>> >>>> That's probably because it still comes with texliveFull, which is >what >>>> most people use I imagine. >>>> >>>>> Ideally I'd like to handle all of unicode, but just skipping any >unrenderable characters would be OK too, since I gather latex doesn't >do that yet? >>>> >>>> AFAIK, Latex never dealt with Unicode natively. Xelatex has much >simpler >>>> font support (fontspec) so I've always opted for Xelatex from the >beginning. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Linus >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nix-dev mailing list >>> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> > >_______________________________________________ >nix-dev mailing list >nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev