Hi, On 01/26/2017 10:57 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> I think the main resource cost for us is the build farm and binary > cache. Idea: what about building full i686-linux set only on stable > branches? Yeah, that sounds reasonable. Another possibility is to reduce the number of packages that get built for i686, but it would be tricky to decide which packages to keep. Graham wrote: > Hydra can rebuild the whole nixpkgs set very quickly if we want to and I > don't get the impression anyone is concerned about binary cache size. I think it's more an issue of build time, especially if we want Hydra to build PRs (which could trigger a full rebuild in the worst case). -- Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
