On 5 March 2017 at 20:22, Kevin Cox <kevin...@kevincox.ca> wrote: > Oops, forgot to include the list. > > On Mar 5, 2017 16:15, "Sander" <ni...@humilis.net> wrote: > > Graham Christensen wrote (ao): >> NixOS 17.03 has entered Beta. This means we now have 3 versions of NixOS >> being developed: >> >> - 16.09 (stable) >> - 17.03 (beta) >> - unstable > > Would it make sense to have a 'nixos-stable' channel that points to > whatever channel is stable? > > It's kinda a weird concept, as there would be breaking changes whenever it > switched between releases but I do see the use of a more tested stream then > nixos-unstable. Maybe it would be a channel with breaking changes but "no" > broken packages? > > I would love to hear what people think about this.
As long as the nixos-stable channel is an opt-in, why not? Best regards, Bjørn Forsman _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
