I haven't read the latest changes in the RFC, but I welcome any more formal process for major changes.
Thank you @zimbatm for pursuing this. > On 09 March 2017 at 13:09 Tomasz Czyż <tomasz.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks! Great stuff! > > 2017-03-08 21:21 GMT+00:00 zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com>: > > > The RFC for RFCs is ready for a final round of review. Unless there are > > major objections I would like to move forward with it, with the idea that > > we can always improve the process with further RFCs. > > > > https://github.com/zimbatm/rfcs/pull/1 > > > > On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 20:17 Maarten Hoogendoorn <maar...@moretea.nl> > > wrote: > > > >> Also see the notes that Arian took during the BoF session at FOSDEM: > >> > >> We had a very spontaneous NixOS discussion panel at FOSDEM. > >> > >> I took minutes. I must say they're a bit rushy at times, so add stuff to > >> it > >> you think isn't clear or is lacking in content. Thanks! > >> > >> > >> http://piratepad.net/1nHg65LMQj > >> > >> > >> 2017-02-12 19:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Hunger <tehun...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> That would be amazing! I actually have an email sitting in my draft > >> folder proposing Nix Enhancement Proposals (NEPs). > >> > >> IMHO one of the things we aren't very good at is getting larger changes > >> merged or rejected. We attract a lot of smart people because Nix is pretty > >> awesome. These smart people then do substantial work, submit a PR and the > >> PR bitrots. This is highly demotivating. > >> > >> An RFC process would allow us to get to an accept / reject early on, with > >> the expectation that accepted RFCs will be merged when the technical work > >> is done. > >> > >> I'll add more specific comments to your PR. > >> > >> ~ > >> > >> On 12 February 2017 at 15:12, zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> we discussed of introducing a RFC process during FOSDEM. The goal is to > >> help discussion for large or controversial changes which typically grind to > >> a halt. > >> > >> Here is an initial proposal based on the one from the Rust community: > >> https://github.com/zimbatm/rfcs/pull/1 . Please let me know what you > >> think. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> z > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nix-dev mailing list > >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nix-dev mailing list > >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > nix-dev mailing list > > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > > > > > > -- > Tomasz Czyż > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev -- Rok Garbas, https://garbas.si _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev