AOKP is a good source to go to as an alternative to CM

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:05 PM, ./aal <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2.2 is slow and old
> I have been running jelly bean
> boatloads of improvement
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Mark J. Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> With so much happening so fast over the next 2-3 months in the smartphone
>> arena, and with the Nexus 4 selling out in the US 25 minutes after it went
>> on to Google Play, I think my best immediate option is to wait and see what
>> the carriers do if the Nexus 4 shifts the paradigm a little.  I have been
>> happy with my Droid 1.  It has done what I wanted it to do.  That said, I
>> can’t speak to the problems others here have had with Motorola devices. I
>> wonder if Google’s acquisition will mitigate some of those Q/A issues down
>> the road?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Anyways, still fed up with my Droid becoming slow and “dirty”, I thought
>> about trying a wipe and then installing something besides OTA 2.2 (Froyo
>> ).  I know a lot of you like CM but I have heard is can be very laggy on
>> D1.  Most ROMs quit developing for D1s by now, but a few haven’t.  One in
>> particular that kept popping up was Steel Droid Gingerbread 2.3 for the
>> D1.  The last release 10.8 was just this past July.  I grabbed it, did a
>> nanodroid backup, wiped and installed.  Wow!  Must say, I’m impressed. A
>> new short term lease on life for my D1 while I wait out the market turmoil.
>> :) Too early to tell what problems, battery and/or memory issues SD might
>> pose, but it was quite zippy out of the gate (but I guess any pristine
>> phone is until it starts to load back on all the crap you had installed
>> from Google, etc).  But, it was a refreshing step.  Though I doubt any of
>> you might still be toting a D1, but if you are, you should look at SD.***
>> *
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Mark****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
>> Behalf Of *./aal
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:17 PM
>> *To:* NLUG ListServ
>> *Subject:* Re: [nlug] Nexus 4 or ???****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I love my SGS3****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Mark J. Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ****
>>
>> Hi All,****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I know I have asked on this before, but I am STILL debating all the
>> viable choices.  I am a little concerned about the Nexus 4 not having LTE,
>> but really like the sound of the new phone a lot. Can anyone here comment
>> on coverage for T-Mobile’s HSPA+42 in the Middle Tennessee main corridors
>> (in particular, Williamson and Davidson Counties)? How about compared to
>> AT&T HSPA+21? I was thinking the T-Mobile unlimited, no contract pre-paid
>> at around $50/month. But, then there is Sprint, Verizon and AT&T LTE
>> (especially with AT&T announcement last week to cover 300mil Americans with
>> LTE by 2014 (think that was the target time line)).  I want to stay Android
>> and I want root. ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> If I don’t do the Nexus 4, anyone have thoughts about the Droid Razr Maxx
>> HD? If not these, and not T-Mobile, and not any Apples, what would be the
>> most geek-centric device current on the market, and subsequently, should I
>> just stay with Verizon? And will Obama get re-elected in 2016? :)****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> My biggest dilemma is deciding which matter more to me; choosing between
>> device/features or having data (well, and voice to a lesser extent)
>> coverage out away from primary areas.  We went hiking in the eastern
>> Smoky’s this past weekend. From our cabin in Maggie Valley, NC, I still had
>> 2 to 3 bars of 3G on my Droid 1 whereas my hiking buddy (who has the
>> iphone5 and AT&T LTE) , had spotty coverage at best away from the main
>> highways. So, this past weekend, I was glad I still had Verizon. But, that
>> is an infrequent scenario.  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> What I am afraid of is that if I go with the Nexus 4 and switch to
>> T-Mobile or AT&T HSPA+, that I will find myself more often like my friend
>> in Maggie Valley, but around Middle TN here. I stay in the main coverage
>> zones most of the time (I think – not sure I really trust the calculated
>> coverage maps all that much). So, T-Mobile at $50/month might do just fine.
>> But, if it doesn’t, I could try AT&T, but from what I read, AT&T is not
>> progressing HSPA any further and will eventually replace it (and I hear it
>> ain’t so good in lots of areas as it is).  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I know some of you are probably debating this same thing. If I didn’t
>> have a grandfathered unlimited data Verizon plan presently (and I know that
>> is even now in question), it would be an easier decision.  I’m clear of my
>> 2 year commitment to Verizon too….****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Aww nuts!!  >:-\****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thanks, Mark****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "NLUG" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "NLUG" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en****
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "NLUG" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

Reply via email to