I wasn't complaining about your efficiency. I was looking for some clarity on 
the first command in case I was going to learn from it.

The second command, well, I was showing a more efficient way of not having to 
grep for patterns that might match elsewhere. The extra instance I gave of 
looking for what had port 80 open was of use. lsof usually will try and deref 
the port to it's name. Therefore on a rpm based machine, a grep for http will 
end up giving you a lot of apache references. the lsof -i:80 solves the problem 
by only search TCP port 80.

We all learn. And we don't always know from where we will learn.

----- Original Message -----
> Steve,
> 
> You are right. I meant to type: lsof | head -n 1;lsof | grep TCP
> 
> Yes, I know there are other ways that I could have done this to keep a
> from doing a couple of shells, but I didn't remember the arguments to
> grep off the top of my head. Since it was a keyboard hack I am not
> typically worried about another process or two, but if writing systems
> scripts where it could be done a lot, it would have still been
> prototyped 'easily', but production use would be cleaned up.
> 
> ><> ... Jack
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Steven S. Critchfield
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I am not certain the first command does what you report. top is a
> > command to look at processes. In fact, the command as you posted
> > fails at the option to top.
> 
> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "NLUG" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] For more options, visit this
> group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

-- 
Steven Critchfield [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

Reply via email to