okay i understand your problem and find the namespace idea helpfull
Shane Isbell wrote: > > That's a good point. We need to consider some type of namespace convention > for the packaging. dotnet:library, dotnet:exe, dotnet:winexe may work. > > On 5/18/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> In Java land, jar is a jar, and the "other jars" (ejb, maven-plugin, >> etc) get the more specific name. Does that make sense in this >> environment, or is it still too ambiguous? >> >> Also, 'library' seems at risk of clashing with another packaging type >> at some point. (Actually dll could too if we started producing win32 >> C apps :) >> >> Should they all be specific about being dotnet? >> >> - Brett >> >> On 17/05/2007, at 9:44 AM, Shane Isbell wrote: >> >> > Hi Roland, Evan >> > >> > Multiple packaging types have the same dll extension: netplugin, >> > library, >> > visual-studio-addin Each of these packaging types needs to be >> > specified >> > within the pom file because the life-cycle is slightly different >> > for the >> > given packaging type. In the case of the gac types, there are four >> > flavors >> > of gac types, all with the dll extension, each resolved >> > differently. That >> > some people (myself included) use the extension as the packaging >> > type in one >> > context and not in another causes some confusion. >> > >> > For consistency, the maven install plugin (dotnet version) would >> > need to use >> > -Dextension=dll when installing, but the muliple package types >> > within the >> > pom is required. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Shane >> > >> > >> > On 5/17/07, Roland Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> because when you upload a package to you repo you declare >> >> -Dpackage-type=dll >> >> and in your pom <package>library</package> thats confusing >> >> in the java world you always use the short version, might be >> >> better stick >> >> to >> >> it >> >> >> >> thank you for the tool >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Package-library-should-be-dll- >> >> tf3770719.html#a10660870 >> >> Sent from the nmaven-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com<http:// >> >> nabble.com/> >> >> . >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Package-library-should-be-dll-tf3770719.html#a10737069 Sent from the nmaven-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
