I have two questions both regarding the flexibility of the AssemblyInfo that is generated for C# artifacts.
1) Is there a way to specify a hand-coded AssemblyInfo for an artifact? I know this would be problematic due to version consistency etc, but if someone wanted to manually manage the complexity, could they? 2) Is there any thoughts about adding "friendly assembly" entries into an artifacts pom? e.g. A lists B as a friendly artifact which causes NMaven to add a friendly assembly entry into A's AssemblyInfo which enables B to access the protected members of A. If neither 1 or 2 are supported, I would vote for adding a JIRA for #2. I would like to have the AssemblyInfo generated as it prevents certain mismatch errors. We will just need to ensure that we have configuration support for all needed AssemblyInfo constructs. Thoughts?
