I think the mailing list is slow in general because there is really only one
core developer, and I don't see the benefit in you having design discussions
with yourself :).  If we can get more contributors involved, I think the
discussions will flow naturally.  I continue to try to find time to get
acquainted, but I find I can rarely keep up.  Now that things are becoming
more stable...?, it might be temping for people to get involved.

I am personally very interested in seeing how the maven core can supports
.NET components.  One great starting point would be implementing a surefire
provider for nunit, a task that his been proven difficult or at least
non-intuitive given the current surefire implementation.

My 2 cents,
Evan

On 8/26/07, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I noticed the discussion on the mailing list has been a bit slow lately,
> even with the prospect of doing a release. Initially I had hopes to get to
> graduation within 12 months, but I realize from a community perspective we
> have a long way to go. So I wanted to get some feedback from everybody in
> terms of what they think we can do to improve the situation.
>
> I'm perfectly open to going back to the drawing board on any major issues.
> I had hoped that the architecture for doing .NET plugins would bring in
> .NET
> developers, but I don't see this happening. The platform matching is a
> pretty big chunk of code that the community may not find interesting, so I
> need to find out whether this should still be supported. RDF has, at best,
> gotten lukewarm acceptance. Finally, we have the big issue of how to bring
> .NET support into Maven itself.
>
> Should we just start compiling a list of features and decide whether we
> need
> them and then open up the design?
>
> Shane
>

Reply via email to