NMaven is only setup to build with one specified maven version. You can
change the specified maven version in the properties of the parent pom. For
Visual Studio support, I would recommend versioning a maven-2.1 snapshot
that is over two weeks old (prior to the api incompatibility) and specify
that version within the pom.

Shane

On Dec 2, 2007 8:08 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> That would be my guess, but Shane would know best.
>
> _Evan
>
> On Dec 2, 2007 7:46 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Makes sense - so an overzealous search and replace? 2.1-SNAPSHOT is
> > needed for the embedder only (for use in the VS add in), and 2.0.8
> > for everything else?
> >
> > On 03/12/2007, at 2:41 PM, Evan Worley wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Franz,
> > >
> > > My guess is that is should be 2.1-SNAPSHOT, Shane changed to 2.0.8
> > > recently
> > > due to a couple of issues he experienced.  Here is his email from
> > > last week
> > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-nmaven-dev/
> > > 200711.mbox/%
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Evan
> > >
> > > On Dec 2, 2007 7:26 PM, Franz Allan Valencia See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Good day,
> > >>
> > >> I've just updated my nmaven trunk to -r600420, and i tried
> > >> building it
> > >> with
> > >> bootstrap.bat and i'm getting the following:
> > >>
> > >>  Path to dependency:
> > >>        1)
> > >> org.apache.maven.dotnet:dotnet-embedder:jar:0.14-incubating-SNAPSHOT
> > >>        2) org.apache.maven:maven-embedder:jar:2.0.8
> > >>
> > >> And after asking around, I found out that maven-embedder-2.0.8
> > >> does not
> > >> exist ( it was deleted from svn and was never released or
> > >> deployed )...or
> > >> something like that :-)
> > >>
> > >> With that in mind, um......what now? should it use
> > >> maven-embedder-2.1-SNAPSHOT or maven-embedder-2.0.4 or ...?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Franz
> > >>
> >
> > --
> > Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to