I've deployed a snapshot version to
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.dotnet</groupId>
<artifactId>NUnit.Framework</artifactId>
<version>2.4.6-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
<type>dotnet:library</type>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
Shane
On Jan 15, 2008 11:09 AM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm also going to be deploying a snapshot version into the snapshot repo.
> Does anyone know how we request to deploy a third-party library into the
> incubating repo?
>
> Shane
>
> On Jan 14, 2008 8:08 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Okay, I've checked in the NUnit artifact with incubating in the version.
> > I've changed the group id to org.apache.maven.dotnet, which indicates
> > that we compiled it.
> >
> > Shane
> >
> > On Jan 14, 2008 8:01 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > That works for me.
> > >
> > > -Evan
> > >
> > > On Jan 14, 2008 7:10 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe we should just put the NUnit library in the incubating repo.
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/
> > > >
> > > > Shane
> > > > On Jan 10, 2008 7:42 PM, Evan Worley < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello All,
> > > > >
> > > > > As we are preparing for a NMaven release, there are a few
> > > questions that
> > > > > need to be answered. Most importantly, we will need to deploy
> > > NUnit's
> > > > > framework assembly to a public repository such that NMaven
> > > consumers can
> > > > > compile and run nunit tests. There are a few questions about
> > > this, I
> > > > will
> > > > > list them below.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Who is to control the key used to sign the assembly? NUnit
> > > > > provides their key along with their source, but perhaps we want
> > > to own
> > > > > the
> > > > > key and re-sign the assembly?
> > > > > 2.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.htmlmentions
> > >
> > > > > a few criteria that we cannot meet for this artifact. We will not
> > > > > have all the requires entries in the pom, such as scm url and
> > > > licenses.
> > > > > The
> > > > > other bit is that this page says that we must "*provide proof
> > > that you
> > > > > control the domain",* which we cannot because we don't, though
> > > I've
> > > > > heard other artifacts have been submitted by non-owners.
> > > > > 3. How should, if any, the process differ for uploading .net
> > > artifacts
> > > > > to a public repository?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for any guidance,
> > > > > Evan
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
