On 19/02/2008, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on feedback from the general incubator list, we have the following > issues > > OUTSTANDING > Copyright Name - Should the copyright contain ASF or Apache NMaven? > According to Brett, it should be ASF, which also sounds right to me. Looking > through the incubator project releases: cxf, tika, felix, I also see ASF.
The Notice file(s) in the jars should contain something like Apache NMaven Copyright 2006-2008 The Apache Software Foundation (i.e. as per http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/nmaven/tags/maven-dotnet-parent-0.15-incubating/NOTICE.txt ) *not* maven-archetype-dotnet-class-library Copyright 2006-2008 The Apache Software Foundation IMO that does need to be fixed. > Itemized Notice File - This is done by default. I'm not sure how to remove > the itemization or whether this is necessary. I think it's created by the remote resources plugin. Just remove that and use the NOTICE file that is already in SVN. Likewise, I think the existing NOTICE files in the jars need to be fixed. > .asc.sha1 files - This is also done by default. Looking through the Maven > project in the central repo, I see the same thing. Is this something that we > should be concerned with? That's not at all urgent. > SOLVED > > License headers in test classes However there are still quite a few other source files that don't have headers, for example: maven-dotnet.iml maven-dotnet.ipr archetypes/maven-archetype-class-library/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml The RAT report will show which ones don't have headers. These need to be fixed please. > Incorrect Start Date on Copyright > Manifest entry to contain target and source versions > > Thanks, > Shane
