Thanks Wendy. I'm going to start reviewing the patches this week. If there is interest in the VS studio, we should definitely look into getting something into the trunk. At the Microsoft interoperability conference back in February, Sam said they had loosened up licensing on their package integration, which allows tighter integration into VS. We considered this before, but couldn't pull off with the existing license. This is something we should be looking at as well.
Also Microsoft has released VS 2008 so I'd like to do new work targeting that version. How many people on the list are using VS 2008 vs 2005? Thanks, Shane On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been working with 0.14 + the patches in JIRA (and possibly some > patches that haven't been submitted yet). I want to hold off opening > more issues until the current set gets reviewed, but here are some > comments so far: > > * All of the right-click menu items say "Maven" except the project > importer which says NMaven: Import Project. Looks like NMAVEN-119 is > only for the command-line pom generator, can we get an issue open for > the companion VS integration, so I have somewhere to comment? > > * The right-click menu lists Maven Phase -> Build, but 'build' is not > a phase in the Maven lifecycle. Should it be compile? > > * On the "Stop Maven Build..." menu item, the ellipsis indicates that > there will be another dialog, but there isn't one. > > * Can "Stop Maven Build" be greyed out when a build is not running? > > * Now that I've clicked Tools -> NMaven Build System, it disappeared > from the Tools menu. How do I turn off/shut down the NMaven Build > System? > > * The 'Output' window does not appear automatically when I click Tools > -> NMaven Build System, and I think it used to. If it's not already > open, there is no feedback that anything happened. > > * For the VS integration, the new once-off invocation of mvn (rather > than the long-running Jetty process) seems to be working fine. It > takes us back to Maven 2.0.x, which makes it more consistent with the > Java builds. > > I'm looking forward to seeing the functionality from 0.14 re-appear on > trunk, so we can move up soon. :) > > Thanks, > -- > Wendy >
