>From the command it's easy to support configurable directory structures, but if you plan on using Visual Studio, I strongly encourage the flat directory structure, as that is inline with VS conventions and makes syncing the pom and csproj files much easier.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From Maven, we have the src/main/java convention for Java projects... > what convention is NMaven going to promote for .NET projects? (And > how much deviation from that is going to be supported?) > > What does a well-structured .NET project look like? I'm particularly > interested in multi-module projects. You can have flat directory structures, with a parent pom one level up. Shane > > One I saw today had a flat structure, with the "parent" directory > (with the .sln file) at the same level as directories containing > .csproj files and source code. This leaves nowhere to put the pom.xml > files, unless you put them right beside the .csproj files and use > <sourceDirectory>.</sourceDirectory> (and I'm not even sure that would > work...) > > Thoughts? > > -- > Wendy >
