On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Should it be necessary to put the Microsoft framework dlls in a remote >> repository, or is NMaven supposed to find them in (for example) >> C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727 ? >> > To the best of my knowledge, the .NET framework license prohibits > redistribution of the framework libraries. Apparently the licensing thing has been worked out by the relevant parties-- so assume it's not an issue for the sake of discussion. (And it's a private internal repository in any case.) Even so, now is the time to set the convention for the groupId and artifactIds by putting poms into the repository without the dlls-- like we did with the Sun jars for Java builds even though the license prohibited putting the jars in the central repo. So... does Microsoft.NET.Framework sound okay for a groupId? -- Wendy -- Wendy
