On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> The 'no toolchains' exception is expected. If the csharp compiler toolchain
> is not found, NMaven will default to csc on the classpath. I'll get the
> documentation updated with the snapshot info.

Ok, thanks for the info.

BTW when you're updating the documentation you might update the title
as it says "Apache NMaven 0.15"

//Erik

>
> Thanks,
> Shane
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Erik Ramfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I followed the guide at
>> http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven/0.16/features.html and managed to
>> create a dotnet library. But in order to run tests on the project I
>> had to add the m2-snapshot repository to the pom, otherwise it did not
>> find the nunit artifact. Perhaps adding a section to the guide that
>> the m2-snapshot must be set would be useful for other?
>>  <repositories>
>>    <repository>
>>        <id>m2-snapshot</id>
>>        <name>Maven2 Snapshot Repository</name>
>>        <url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/</url>
>>        <snapshots>
>>            <enabled>true</enabled>
>>        </snapshots>
>>    </repository>
>>  </repositories>
>>
>>
>> Then when I ran the test, I got two "No toolchain found" exceptions in
>> the consolem, but everything ran fine after that. Is there a problem
>> with my installation?
>> [INFO] [dotnet-compiler:test-compile]
>> [INFO] .NET Vendor: MICROSOFT
>> org.apache.maven.dotnet.ExecutionException: No toolchain found.
>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.dotnet.compiler.impl.DotnetCompilerContextImpl.getCompilerExecutableFor(DotnetCompilerContextImpl.java:142)
>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.dotnet.extensions.compiler.CSharpClassCompiler.getCompilerFileName(CSharpClassCompiler.java:200)
>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.dotnet.extensions.compiler.CSharpClassCompiler.compile(CSharpClassCompiler.java:182)
>>        at
>> org.apache.maven.dotnet.plugin.compiler.TestCompilerMojo.execute(TestCompilerMojo.java:156)
>>
>>
>> regards
>> //Erik
>
>

Reply via email to