[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't have anything against Content-Length, I just don't see why > anything but inc should even care. What am I missing? I'm with you, Andy! I don't want any tool messing with the content of the mail. It's a bad idea. It breaks signatures (I'm talking PGP, GNUPG, that sort). And it's ONLY necessary if you're foolish enough to allow your mail to be stored into a mailbox file. Us MH/nmh users don't have to put up with the stupidity of that file format. Use procmail to feed the mail to rcvstore and you'll never have the problem of a body being mistaken for a header line to begin with. Content-Length is evil. "From munging" is only slightly less evil. -Hal <*>
- BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ignore '\n\nFrom ' in m... David Kilzer
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ignore '\n\nFr... Mate Wierdl
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ignore '\n... David D. Kilzer
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ignore... Andrew D. Kailhofer
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ig... David D. Kilzer
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ig... Hal DeVore
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length ... David D. Kilzer
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Len... Hal DeVore
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content... Mate Wierdl
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ignore... Mate Wierdl
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length to ig... Ralph Corderoy
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Length ... Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content-Len... Philip Guenther
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content... Richard Coleman
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content... Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: BUG FIX: Use Content... Hal DeVore
