>What provision in RFC 2060 treats flags as a scarce resource? I missed that >in my reading. It might just be my reading of the specification - there is a fair amount of text regarding the limits w.r.t. permanent flags. >I know of no IMAP server in common use which does not support arbitrary >flags. The issue is which PERMANENTFLAGS they support; I'm not sure of the >answer to that question. Right ... sequences and annotations aren't much good if they aren't permanent :-) --Ken
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ralph Corderoy
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Neil W Rickert
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Scott Blachowicz
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Scott Blachowicz
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] chad
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Chris Garrigues
