Robert Elz wrote: > | How about if I change the test so that it is only ignored for the top > | level directory? > > That would do much less harm, but is unlikely to be so easy (that function > gets called for any level in the hierarchy, if I recall correctly). > > An alternative would be a "try really hard" option (inverse of folder -fast) > that made it ignore the test. > > But for your purposes, wouldn't just making a dummy sub-directory in your new > (symlinks only) Mail directory, until it gets a real folder sub-dir of its own > do just as well? > > kre
OK, I give up. I guess that this is a special case. But I found it real annoying to have to resort to the source code in order to find out why the command mysteriously didn't work. I think a warning on the manual page would suffice. Jon
