> Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > >Why? nmh doesn't need any new features, and the code is stable and > >portable. > > > >The best indicator that a chunk of code is mature is when it hasn't been > >touched for five years. It ain't broke, so leave it alone. > > I'd really really like better MIME support (and in particular > support for replying to MIMEd emails, and getting character > set encodings and so on correct). I just haven't had any > time to do anything, and I don't get quite enough MIME email > to cause it to move up my priority list :-) > > I did get to the point of sketching out a design for how I > thought this could be done. (The tricky bit is arranging > for it to be reasonably consistent for new users or people > wanting to switch to it, without having it break scripts, > components files, etc for existing users.) > > -- PMM
I agree that having better support for replying to MIMEd emails would be nice. If I ever have the time I'd still like to implement the changes that I proposed years ago for better reading of MIMEd messages. Jon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
