On January 29, 2010 at 23:01, Ken Hornstein wrote: > If your interest is to only exchange messages with other > nmh users, then I guess you won't care ... but I would suggest that > if nmh doesn't evolve, at some point there won't be any other nmh > users.
I agree. For years, I have used a separate program I wrote to deal with replying to MIME messages: <http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/extras/mha-mhedit/mha-mhedit.html> It ain't the most efficient thing, but it works. And I have found over time that I've had to use it more frequently, even for basic messages. Ideally nmh should do what mha-mhedit basicly does. Of course, the other big hurdle nmh has is that it is command-line oriented, limiting those who may choose to use it to more advanced computer users that appreciate the power and flexibilty the command-line can provide. I think the capabilities and maintenance of GUI front-ends to nmh may be the determining factor if nmh stays around or fades away. --ewh _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
