David Levine wrote: > > These are definitely just wrong -- we shouldn't be specifying > > name and x-unix-mode for the body text
Yes, that's badly wrong. I've never used -attach, one of the reasons being that I didn't like it including x-unix-mode. Another thing that bothered me was that I couldn't get it to apply the attachments but defer sending so that I could run list to see the results. But I must admit that I like the idea of not having to remember to type mime when my e-mail contains attachments, or the odd umlaut or pound sign. > Adding -attachformat 1 to the send entry of your .mh_profile > will get rid of the name and x-unix-mode. That option can The name is useful for actual attachments although we should really be using Content-Disposition for that. For the body, I can't understand why anyone would want either name or x-unix-mode. Oliver _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
